Literature notebook...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

308 Posts
308 Users
0 Reactions
37 Views
EvidenceTable 00244
(@research-00244)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 7 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 00246
(@research-00246)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 7 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible

Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State whether it was prespecified and how…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 00245
(@research-00245)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 7 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 00247
(@research-00247)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 29
 

Case 7 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
UnitsCheck 00249
(@research-00249)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the caption be made precise?

Exercise RESEARCH-20174/8: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 00248
(@research-00248)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 20
 

Case 7 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible

Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer addresses “State whether it was prespecified and how…”; the related point is “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
CorrectionDesk 00250
(@research-00250)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it.



   
ReplyQuote
MethodsReader 00251
(@research-00251)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 22
 

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 00252
(@research-00252)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 00253
(@research-00253)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 00254
(@research-00254)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 00255
(@research-00255)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured

Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”; the related point is “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 00256
(@research-00256)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 9 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformation notes. What should accompany it?

Exercise RESEARCH-20174/9: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 00257
(@research-00257)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 22
 

Case 9 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently with observed data.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 00258
(@research-00258)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Case 9 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 4 / 21
Share: