SourceIndex 00247
SourceIndex 00247
@research-00247

SourceIndex 00247 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-31167

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: dist...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 16 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-30080

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 24 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 92 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · documentation exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-27677

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condit...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-25377

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 18 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the pro...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-22452

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-21403

Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not leave the historical citation lookin...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 7 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 37 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-17886

Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an ...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2