MethodsReader 00251
MethodsReader 00251
@research-00251

MethodsReader 00251 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-26555

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-25378

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 18 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-22453

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-21405

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 37 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-17886

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-16599

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 28 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-13151

Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-11764

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10500

Case 15 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09452

Case 8 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2