Notifications
Clear all
Lab work & testing
347
Posts
347
Users
0
Reactions
48
Views
09/08/2019 8:33 am
Case 47 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: distinguish the discussion point “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
09/08/2019 9:27 am
Case 48 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
09/08/2019 9:39 am
Case 48 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
09/08/2019 10:36 am
Case 48 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
09/08/2019 10:48 am
Case 48 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
09/08/2019 11:28 am
Case 48 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
09/08/2019 11:32 am
Case 48 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…”; the related point is “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
09/08/2019 12:28 pm
Case 49 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
09/08/2019 12:41 pm
Case 49 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformation notes. What should accompany it?
Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it. Use the original answer fragment “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-05494/49: address this question within its stated limits.
09/08/2019 1:27 pm
Case 49 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
09/08/2019 1:34 pm
Case 49 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: use “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
09/08/2019 2:23 pm
Case 49 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
09/08/2019 2:56 pm
Case 49 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the answer addresses “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…”; the related point is “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
09/08/2019 3:00 pm
Case 49 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise
Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it.
09/08/2019 3:40 pm
Case 50 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise
A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropriate response?
Review focus: comparison. Make the basis of a comparison explicit before interpreting it. Use the original answer fragment “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-05494/50: address this question within its stated limits.
Share: