CitationNotes 01392 · Member profile
Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether as...
A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...
An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...
Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep speculation explicitly labelle...
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” be...
Case 24 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...
Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the source citation, retri...
Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with s...
Case 29 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...
Case 23 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? ...
Case 16 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformat...
Case 26 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...