EvidenceTable 01394
EvidenceTable 01394
@research-01394

EvidenceTable 01394 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 4 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond? Exercise RE...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-29595

Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. A review article can help locate sources, but it is not a substitute for...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-28634

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Create separate columns for the quanti...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26703

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-25596

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” is an excerpt fro...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 24 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-22642

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-21550

Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: use “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” as ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-20272

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 29 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16822

Case 23 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point b...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 16 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 26 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2