CorrectionDesk 09700
CorrectionDesk 09700
@research-09700

CorrectionDesk 09700 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27596

Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-26482

Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” is an excerpt from the...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-25225

Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: distinguish the discussion point “Separate document provenance...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23960

Case 29 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertai...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22395

Case 36 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: di...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 20 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-20118

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-19138

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-17831

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-16507

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-15388

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-14306

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-13020

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11716

Case 35 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise An animal experiment is cited as though it establishes a human outco...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-10446

Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2