Notifications
Clear all
Corrections & citations
363
Posts
363
Users
0
Reactions
50
Views
20/10/2025 7:51 pm
Case 24 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive
Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
20/10/2025 8:37 pm
Case 24 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive
Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the wording beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
20/10/2025 8:43 pm
Case 24 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive
Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
20/10/2025 8:52 pm
Case 24 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive
Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer addresses “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…”; the related point is “Do not leave the historical citation looking…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
20/10/2025 9:51 pm
Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise
A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-27596/25: address this question within its stated limits.
20/10/2025 10:43 pm
Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
20/10/2025 10:47 pm
Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise
Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
20/10/2025 11:33 pm
Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
20/10/2025 11:45 pm
Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise
Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/10/2025 12:04 am
Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise
Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer addresses “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…”; the related point is “State whether it was prespecified and how…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/10/2025 12:36 am
Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: distinguish the discussion point “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/10/2025 1:34 am
Case 26 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the caption be made precise?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-27596/26: address this question within its stated limits.
21/10/2025 1:37 am
Case 26 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/10/2025 1:58 am
Case 26 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
21/10/2025 2:36 am
Case 26 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
Share: