CorrectionDesk 06410
CorrectionDesk 06410
@research-06410

CorrectionDesk 06410 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-29100

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28293

Case 9 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? A value has been quoted without units, assay method or reference interval. W...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 23 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 34 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24804

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 26 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-22000

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-20931

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-19746

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 51 — A correction log for an archive article · comparison exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the ar...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 30 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-16131

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 2 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-13814

Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginning “Describe the species, model and…” in the record. If...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12618

Case 18 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducibl...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2