EvidenceTable 06404 · Member profile
Case 34 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 8 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notic...
Case 22 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addres...
Case 33 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: dist...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 26 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...
Case 50 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · comparison exercise Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ex...
Case 29 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Method note for “Two laboratories, two perce...
Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: distinguish the discussion point “Separate document provenance...
Case 1 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary ...