CorrectionDesk 06400
CorrectionDesk 06400
@research-06400

CorrectionDesk 06400 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-30338

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 34 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-29097

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28293

Case 7 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 22 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginni...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 33 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-24800

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Record the original units and axis transforma...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 25 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sam...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-21998

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20928

Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expand it on first use and name the…” is an excerpt from the discuss...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-19743

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 49 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-met...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 28 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-16129

Method note for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: use “Separate document provenance, identity, purity and…” as a ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 1 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Re...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2