EvidenceTable 05214 · Member profile

Case 46 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, tw...

Case 28 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “...

Case 156 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · indexing exercise Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...

Case 28 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Public...

Case 39 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, t...

Case 18 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

Case 7 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original report...

Case 16 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the word...

Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “Retain units, method, laborator...

Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...