UnitsCheck 05209
UnitsCheck 05209
@research-05209

UnitsCheck 05209 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-31020

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30724

Case 10 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30288

Case 13 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29861

Case 46 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two per...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-29043

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-28247

Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinici...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 27 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 155 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · indexing exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an arc...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 27 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-23373

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 39 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-20795

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 18 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and d...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 6 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all presp...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2