EvidenceTable 05204
EvidenceTable 05204
@research-05204

EvidenceTable 05204 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 27 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describe...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 155 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · indexing exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an ar...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 26 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-23372

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-ge...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 38 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-20793

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 17 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer diffe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-18657

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 5 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 15 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-14931

Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: retain the wording beginning “The reader should be able to see w...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-13647

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12476

Case 22 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11060

Case 38 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2