StudyDesign 05096 · Member profile
Case 28 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...
Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Association does not identify direction or causatio...
Case 6 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population...
Case 7 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observatio...
Case 37 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative...
Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...
Case 12 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...
Case 139 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · correction exercise Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: what b...
Case 11 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all pres...
Case 23 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...
Case 2 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” belongs to...