EvidenceTable 05094
EvidenceTable 05094
@research-05094

EvidenceTable 05094 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-29022

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-28218

Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inter...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 12 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 139 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · correction exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading a preclinical paper: w...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 11 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitation...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-23349

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 22 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-20766

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 1 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-18641

Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…”;...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-17273

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-16047

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13622

Case 46 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12476

Case 7 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and de...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2