ArchiveReader 04555 · Member profile
Case 22 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Describe the species,...
Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...
Case 40 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...
Case 54 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypot...
Case 34 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Case 17 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study con...
Case 21 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link th...
Case 62 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” i...
Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep speculation explicitly labelle...