StudyDesign 01666 · Member profile

Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...

The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidence and revised interpretation. Preserve that distinction in subse...

Case 26 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise A value has been quoted without units, assay meth...

Case 18 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...

Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from it...

Case 2 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point ...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

Case 5 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. ...

Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...

Case 18 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-refere...

Case 19 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citat...