StudyDesign 01666
StudyDesign 01666
@research-01666

StudyDesign 01666 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10625

Case 11 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09543

Case 131 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · correction exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysis: ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-08379

Case 16 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-07073

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-05530

Case 14 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-04055

Case 39 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beg...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-02605

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-01264

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-00279

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2