AssayNotebook 01613
AssayNotebook 01613
@research-01613

AssayNotebook 01613 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-27776

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26751

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 18 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: u...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 11 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual de...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-22702

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-21591

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” is an excerp...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-20321

Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wording beginning “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…”...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 43 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-16861

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 47 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ran...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-14481

Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…”; the re...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 10 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-11938

Case 11 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10625

Case 4 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? E...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2