FigureNotes 01548
FigureNotes 01548
@research-01548

FigureNotes 01548 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-29609

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-28652

Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: distinguish the discussion point “State whether it was prespecified and how…...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-27760

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Such material can suggest questions but…” from it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-26732

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” as a row he...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 9 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 1 — A correction log for an archive article Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the origi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-22686

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-21580

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-20307

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 33 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-18077

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-16849

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 38 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the lab...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 48 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, tw...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 1 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sa...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2