FigureNotes 01538
FigureNotes 01538
@research-01538

FigureNotes 01538 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-29608

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-28652

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-27760

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-26731

Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer addresses “Do not leave the historical citation looking…”; the re...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24204

Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer addresses “Statistical significance alone does not establish…”; ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22682

Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with stated qualifications, or not established. Explain the reason for each label.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-21576

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20304

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 32 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 50 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · comparison exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A la...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-16846

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 36 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguis...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 47 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise A reagent dossier contains a summary purity pe...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2