SourceIndex 01537
SourceIndex 01537
@research-01537

SourceIndex 01537 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-27760

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-26731

Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the wording beginning “Do not leave the historical citation looking...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dat...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24204

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Statistical significance alone does not est...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22682

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-21576

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20304

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 32 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “In...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 49 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise Reader check for “Reading a preclinical paper: what bel...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-16846

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 36 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 46 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-13324

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-11938

Case 1 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-10609

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2