StudyDesign 01386
StudyDesign 01386
@research-01386

StudyDesign 01386 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-31182

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 46 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-30616

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, un...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-28633

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-27726

Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: distinguish the discussion point “State the study design and what was...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-26701

Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…”; the related ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-25596

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-22638

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-21550

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-20268

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” is an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 10 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itsel...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 28 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Method note for “A literature note that separates hyp...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2