CorrectionDesk 01320
CorrectionDesk 01320
@research-01320

CorrectionDesk 01320 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 53 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-26685

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-25578

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 14 — A correction log for an archive article A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repair...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-22618

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-21530

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20267

Case 23 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 1 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 18 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16822

Case 12 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 5 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 15 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11929

Case 3 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-10558

Case 35 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2