CorrectionDesk 00960 · Member profile

Case 14 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope...

Case 8 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-referen...

Case 25 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...

Case 26 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study...

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Do not subtract the two percentages as though they repre...

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

Case 14 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? ...

Case 49 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · comparison exercise Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the p...

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

Case 28 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...