CorrectionDesk 00960 · Member profile

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” fr...

Case 7 — A correction log for an archive article Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and th...

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

Case 30 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual de...

Case 35 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise m...

Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: distinguish the discussion point “State the study design and what was...

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

Case 14 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationshi...

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” is an excerp...