EvidenceTable 00114
EvidenceTable 00114
@research-00114

EvidenceTable 00114 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-27643

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-26524

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-25345

Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: distinguish the discussion point “Separate document provenance...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24036

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 14 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-21375

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 32 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 18 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitation...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 22 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 32 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answe...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-15497

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt fr...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 9 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-13121

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-11737

Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the answer addresses “Separate document provenance, identity,...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-10492

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2