An evidence table w...
 
Notifications
Clear all

An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-15497

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
CorrectionDesk 00110
(@research-00110)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 22
Topic starter   [#15508]

How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes?

Discussion record: RESEARCH-15497.



   
Quote
MethodsReader 00111
(@research-00111)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 20
 

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s direct observations.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 00113
(@research-00113)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 00112
(@research-00112)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 00114
(@research-00114)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: