Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
331
Posts
331
Users
0
Reactions
4
Views
17/10/2021 6:29 pm
Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
17/10/2021 7:34 pm
Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation
Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was actually measured…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
17/10/2021 7:44 pm
Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation
Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
17/10/2021 8:08 pm
Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation
Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the answer addresses “State the study design and what was actually measured…”; the related point is “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
17/10/2021 8:52 pm
Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise
Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discussion acknowledge?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-13327/25: address this question within its stated limits.
17/10/2021 9:00 pm
Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
17/10/2021 9:47 pm
Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise
Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
17/10/2021 10:14 pm
Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
17/10/2021 10:53 pm
Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise
Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginning “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
17/10/2021 10:57 pm
Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise
Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…”; the related point is “Report sample size, potential confounders…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
18/10/2021 12:00 am
Case 26 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise
Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How should a comparison be documented?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-13327/26: address this question within its stated limits.
18/10/2021 12:19 am
Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
18/10/2021 1:04 am
Case 26 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise
Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
18/10/2021 1:20 am
Case 26 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise
Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
18/10/2021 1:33 am
Case 26 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.
Share: