CorrectionDesk 01710
CorrectionDesk 01710
@research-01710

CorrectionDesk 01710 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 21 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point b...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-28675

Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26765

Case 6 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 32 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 25 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-22721

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 8 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observa...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-20337

Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: distinguish the discussion point “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-19258

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16869

Case 11 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-15740

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” as a row he...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-14498

The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2