Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
6
Posts
6
Users
0
Reactions
1
Views
Topic starter
31/07/2019 2:24 am
A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice also changes a figure. How can the correction history distinguish those two events?
Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-05476.
31/07/2019 3:04 am
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
31/07/2019 4:10 am
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the original paper.
31/07/2019 4:26 am
Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summary.
31/07/2019 5:11 am
Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand what changed.
31/07/2019 5:48 am
If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.
Share: