StudyDesign 00986 · Member profile

Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: “Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction…” is ...

Case 17 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...

Case 11 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note...

Case 29 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...

Case 29 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...

Case 17 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...

Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a...

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

Case 32 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...