Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
4
Posts
4
Users
0
Reactions
0
Views
Topic starter
06/02/2018 5:09 pm
A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established clinical effect. How can the note be corrected?
| Field | Scope |
|---|---|
| Subject | A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation |
| Exercise | Discuss the stated question; distinguish sources, interpretations and unresolved points. |
06/02/2018 6:28 pm
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually measured…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
06/02/2018 6:41 pm
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating it into treatment advice.
06/02/2018 6:58 pm
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Share: