Reference-table wor...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-07416

321 Posts
321 Users
0 Reactions
33 Views
CorrectionDesk 04360
(@research-04360)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 45 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise

Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer addresses “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…”; the related point is “State whether it was prespecified and how…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
CitationNotes 04362
(@research-04362)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 46 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the caption be made precise?

Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.

Exercise RESEARCH-07416/46: address this question within its stated limits.



   
ReplyQuote
AssayNotebook 04363
(@research-04363)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 46 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
EvidenceTable 04364
(@research-04364)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 26
 

Case 46 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
ArchiveReader 04365
(@research-04365)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 23
 

Case 46 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
StudyDesign 04366
(@research-04366)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Case 46 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise

Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 22 / 22
Share: