EvidenceTable 09984
EvidenceTable 09984
@research-09984

EvidenceTable 09984 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 2 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output tog...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 63 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · comparison exercise Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges:...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-27616

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26487

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-25316

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-24013

Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” is an excerpt from the d...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-22439

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-21345

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 13 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measu...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-19197

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 3 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 14 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-15467

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-14379

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-13098

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2