EvidenceTable 09954
EvidenceTable 09954
@research-09954

EvidenceTable 09954 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-29464

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 60 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentag...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-27613

Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 35 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-24005

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-22432

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 56 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ex...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 9 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-19191

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 9 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-14369

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-13085

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2