AssayNotebook 09933
AssayNotebook 09933
@research-09933

AssayNotebook 09933 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 28
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-31231

Case 20 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-31198

Case 26 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distin...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-31163

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 18 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether as...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-30052

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-29459

Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Keep this as research documentation and d...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 57 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 32 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-25299

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-22430

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 53 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”:...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 6 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describ...

3 years ago
Page 1 / 2