UnitsCheck 09919
UnitsCheck 09919
@research-09919

UnitsCheck 09919 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 18 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archi...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 2 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-30050

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-29458

Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” in...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 55 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the read...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27602

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 30 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-23996

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-22426

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 51 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the ans...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point be...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-19184

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 4 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2