MethodsReader 09911
MethodsReader 09911
@research-09911

MethodsReader 09911 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-31162

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 17 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 2 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-30049

Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the point beginning “A percentage without its method and samp...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-29457

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 54 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · comparison exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the lab...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-27600

Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: distinguish the discussion point “Expand it on first use and name the…” fro...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 29 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-23995

Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-22422

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 50 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates hyp...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 3 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-19181

Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection cont...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-17868

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Statistical significance alone does not est...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2