CorrectionDesk 09910
CorrectionDesk 09910
@research-09910

CorrectionDesk 09910 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-30049

Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: distinguish the discussion point “Separate document provenance...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 54 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-27600

Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer addresses “Expand it on first use and name the…”; the related p...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-25291

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-23995

Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 50 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-20169

Case 3 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducible...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-19181

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-17868

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” is an excerpt fro...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 3 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel wi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-15447

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-14359

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2