ArchiveReader 09905 · Member profile
Case 53 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an a...
Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...
Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...
Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in...
Case 49 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: w...
Case 2 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...
Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.
Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...
Case 2 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidenc...
Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...
Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...
Case 16 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Repor...