StudyDesign 09896 · Member profile

Method note for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: use “They have different sources and may…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

Case 52 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the ...

Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

Case 48 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...

Case 1 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the r...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

Case 1 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note ...

Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed ...

A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...

Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” is an excer...