EvidenceTable 09894
EvidenceTable 09894
@research-09894

EvidenceTable 09894 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 52 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whethe...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27596

Case 52 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Exp...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-25286

Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Describe the species, model and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record....

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-23991

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-22417

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 48 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-20168

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-19176

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-17865

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16563

Case 1 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-15442

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-14355

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-13074

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11733

Case 15 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducibl...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2