StudyDesign 09886 · Member profile
Case 51 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · comparison exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings...
Case 51 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transf...
Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...
Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Case 47 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise m...
Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...
Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from it...
Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...
The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...
Case 13 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...