EvidenceTable 09884
EvidenceTable 09884
@research-09884

EvidenceTable 09884 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 17 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual de...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-30567

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-30047

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-29452

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 50 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · comparison exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: dist...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27596

Case 51 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise A table has been copied into a new format without its...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-25283

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-22413

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 46 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-20164

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-19175

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-17863

Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” in the r...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-16560

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2