AssayNotebook 09883 · Member profile

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

Case 50 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the...

Case 50 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reade...

Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

Case 46 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, potential confounders…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...