StudyDesign 09836
StudyDesign 09836
@research-09836

StudyDesign 09836 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 44 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answe...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27596

Case 44 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reference management: dist...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 18 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-25267

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-23973

Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the measurement, population...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-22397

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 39 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-20152

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-19169

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-17855

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-16549

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-15426

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-13058

Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the answer addresses “Create separate columns for the quant...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11733

Case 6 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving t...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2