CorrectionDesk 09830
CorrectionDesk 09830
@research-09830

CorrectionDesk 09830 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 44 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive en...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27596

Case 43 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 17 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citat...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-25265

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-23973

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22395

Case 55 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the meth...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 39 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-20151

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Record when only a secondary account was ac...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-19168

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-17853

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not…” as a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-15425

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt fr...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-14343

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-13058

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11733

Case 5 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage in...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2