CorrectionDesk 09810
CorrectionDesk 09810
@research-09810

CorrectionDesk 09810 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 14 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point b...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-30558

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30040

Case 26 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-29438

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 41 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27596

Case 40 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 14 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately....

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-25257

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-23967

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Locate the primary study and conf...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22395

Case 52 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates hyp...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 36 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-20148

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” is an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-19162

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-16539

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2